Tamila Gadamauri vs Merel Hoedt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Sep at 11:11 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Gadamauri vs M. Hoedt

BEL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gadamauri 1 - 0 Hoedt
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tamila Gadamauri winning 2 and Merel Hoedt winning 0. The last match between Tamila Gadamauri and Merel Hoedt was at the W15 Dijon, 11-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Tamila Gadamauri getting the victory 6-2 4-0 ret..
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Gadamauri | 1 |
Hoedt | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Dijon(09-11-25)
T. Gadamauri vs M. Hoedt H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
60.87% (42-27) | Career Total W/L | 54.25% (198-167) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
0 | Titles | 3 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Gadamauri vs M. Hoedt Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Hoedt has slightly outperformed Gadamauri in second serve points, winning 38.3% compared to 37.59% for Gadamauri. This suggests a marginal edge in second serve efficiency.
- Analyzing return games, Hoedt has won 56.2% of opponent's second serve points recently, while Gadamauri has achieved 51.67%. Does this suggest a stronger return game for Hoedt? The data would indicate so.
- For first serve returns, Hoedt's 36.63% is somewhat higher than Gadamauri's 35.64%, reinforcing a potential advantage in return performance.
- The ability to save breakpoints shows Hoedt with a 47.83% success rate, higher than Gadamauri's 41.57%, implying Hoedt might perform better under pressure.
- Considering overall match wins in the past year, Gadamauri's win percentage of 61.4% surpasses Hoedt's 52%, indicating a more consistent performance.
- On surface preferences, Hoedt excels on clay with a 57% win rate, whereas Gadamauri prefers hard courts with 71% effectiveness.
- A comparison of match levels reveals that Gadamauri has achieved a higher win rate (63.27%) than Hoedt (55.56%) in similar-level tournaments.
- In terms of opponent quality, Gadamauri has challenged higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 260.42, compared to Hoedt's 356.88.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Hoedt has a better track record, winning 57% of such situations, over Gadamauri's 50%.
- Looking at recent breakpoint conversion rates, Hoedt has a clear edge, converting 45.36% compared to Gadamauri’s 38.5%.
Editorial Prediction (September 11, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating recent performance trends, Hoedt shows a modest advantage over Gadamauri in several crucial areas. Hoedt's second serve point win rate and return game effectiveness indicate slightly superior service game management.
When it comes to handling pressure situations, Hoedt’s higher breakpoint conversion and saving rates present a key strength. Although Gadamauri boasts a higher win percentage and has played against tougher opponents, Hoedt's better deciding set performance and return game proficiency can be pivotal in this matchup.
Overall, while both players have their distinct advantages, the cumulative stats suggest Hoedt might have the upper hand, making them the likely winner in the upcoming tennis match.
Tamila Gadamauri vs Merel Hoedt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Gadamauri vs M. Hoedt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
10 | Games Won | 2 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:6:21 | Average Match Time | 1:6:21 |
59% (19/32) | 1st Serve % | 69% (40/58) |
84% (16/19) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (20/40) |
54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (5/18) |
56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
57% (33/58) | Return Points Win % | 28% (9/32) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Gadamauri Recent Matches Played
M. Hoedt Recent Matches Played

T. Gadamauri vs M. Hoedt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.87% (42/27) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.25% (198/167) |
59.87% (91/61) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.77% (442/380) |
55.90% (763/602) | Games Win/Loss | 52.45% (3855/3495) |
71.43% (10/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.85% (56/52) |
57.69% (30/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.28% (130/101) |
66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.00% (12/13) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
37 | Aces Total | 379 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.56 |
188 | Total Double Faults | 2006 |
1:4:56 | Average Match Time | 1:39:19 |
264.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.18 |
58% (1578/2725) | 1st Serve % | 64% (14017/21831) |
61% (966/1578) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8392/14017) |
44% (500/1147) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (3256/7814) |
47% (188/399) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1518/3034) |
48% (1386/2898) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10782/22294) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
50.00% (7/7) | Challenger W/L | 52.50% (84/76) |
63.64% (35/20) | Futures W/L | 55.88% (114/90) |
60% (41/68) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (191/356) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
40% (4/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (29/62) |
47% (7/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (47/99) |
93% (41/38) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (200/171) |
7% (41/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (200/26) |
14% (28/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (165/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
